Town Meeting Funds $630K for High School Turf Field Replacement Amid Health Concerns

Key Points

  • - The town will spend $630,000 from its reserves to replace the high school's turf field, now 11 years old.
  • - School officials argued the existing field is a safety hazard, with hardness levels that increase concussion risk.
  • - Residents raised strong objections based on potential health risks from chemicals and microplastics in synthetic turf.
  • - The article passed by a voice vote.

Hingham Town Meeting approved funding to replace the 11-year-old synthetic turf field at Hingham High School, voting in favor of Article 32 after a lengthy and emotional debate over student safety and potential environmental health risks. The town will transfer $630,000 from unassigned fund balance to cover the majority of the $880,000 project cost, with the remaining $250,000 coming from the school department's revolving fund.

School officials and supporters presented the replacement as a critical safety need. Advisory Committee member Joe Griffin explained that third-party testing showed the field's hardness, or GMax value, now exceeds safety thresholds, increasing the risk of concussions. Superintendent Katherine Roberts detailed the field's heavy use by numerous sports teams for over 400 practices and 100 games annually, stating that a return to a natural grass field was not sustainable for that level of use. Supporters also noted that modern turf materials would be tested to ensure they do not contain harmful PFAS chemicals.

The proposal drew passionate opposition from residents concerned about the health risks of synthetic turf. Sarah Gordon, a resident who has researched the issue extensively, argued that the fields contain numerous toxic substances and that children absorb these chemicals. "It is beyond my comprehension how...we are going to vote to install a field that if we are honest all of us know at a minimum is carcinogenic," she said. Another resident, a scientist, warned that microplastic particles from the turf could compromise the long-term health of athletes. Despite these concerns, the article passed by a strong majority on a voice vote.